ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching×Ponderazione basata sul punteggio di propensione (PSW / IPW)×
CampoInferenza causaleInferenza causale
FamigliaRegression modelRegression model
Anno di origine20041983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
IdeatoreMcCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipoCausal inference / matchingCausal inference / reweighting
Fonte seminaleMcCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliasML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matchingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Correlati66
SintesiMachine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Consultato il 2026-06-18 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare