Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Analisi della conversazione basata sul campo× | Analisi della Conversazione× | Analisi del Discorso× | Etnografia× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Qualitativo | Qualitativo | Ricerca qualitativa | Qualitativo |
| Famiglia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anno di origine≠ | 1960s–1970s (CA foundations); field applications consolidated from the 1990s onward | Late 1960s–1974 (foundational lectures 1964–1972; landmark article 1974) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) | c. 1922 (Malinowski's Argonauts of the Western Pacific) |
| Ideatore≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA roots); extended to field settings by later ethnomethodologists | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell | Bronisław Malinowski (modern ethnography); rooted in 19th-century anthropology |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative observational-analytic approach | Qualitative research method | Method | Qualitative fieldwork tradition |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Hindmarsh, J., & Llewellyn, N. (2017). Video in sociomaterial investigations: A solution to the problem of relevance for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 412–437. DOI ↗ | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. link ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ | Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (4th ed.). Routledge. ISBN: 978-1138504462 |
| Alias≠ | field CA, naturalistic conversation analysis, in situ conversation analysis, fieldwork CA | CA, talk-in-interaction, sequential analysis, interactional analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis | Etnografi, participant observation, fieldwork, ethnographic research |
| Correlati≠ | 3 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Sintesi≠ | Field-based conversation analysis (field CA) applies the rigorous sequential-analytic methods of conversation analysis to talk and interaction recorded in real-world settings — workplaces, clinics, classrooms, and public spaces — rather than to pre-existing corpora or laboratory data. By combining sustained fieldwork access with fine-grained transcript analysis, it reveals how social order is accomplished turn by turn in the actual environments where it matters. | Conversation Analysis (CA) is a qualitative research method that examines the fine-grained sequential structure of naturally occurring talk and social interaction. Developed by sociologists Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson in the 1960s and 1970s, CA investigates how participants in a conversation accomplish social actions — such as invitations, refusals, or diagnoses — through the precise moment-by-moment organisation of their talk, including turn-taking, sequence structure, repair, and recipient design. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. | Ethnography is a qualitative research tradition in which a researcher immerses themselves in a social group or community over an extended period — typically three to six months or longer — to study its culture, values, and behaviours in their natural setting. Originating in social and cultural anthropology, and consolidated as a rigorous method by Bronisław Malinowski in the early twentieth century, ethnography produces rich, contextualised accounts of how people live, work, and make meaning together. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|
|
|