ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Abbinamento Dinamico del Punteggio di Propensione×Ponderazione basata sul punteggio di propensione (PSW / IPW)×
CampoInferenza causaleInferenza causale
FamigliaRegression modelRegression model
Anno di origine1986-20101983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
IdeatoreRobins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matchingRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipoSequential causal matchingCausal inference / reweighting
Fonte seminaleLechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Aliasdynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSMPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Correlati66
SintesiDynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Dynamic Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Consultato il 2026-06-18 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare