ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Estensione Dual Hesitant Fuzzy di TOPSIS×CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System)×
CampoProcesso decisionaleProcesso decisionale
FamigliaMCDMMCDM
Anno di origine20202025
IdeatoreWang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
TipoDual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
Fonte seminaleWang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q. (2020). New Distance Measures for Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Symmetry DOI ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
Alias
Correlati88
SintesiDHF-TOPSIS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, R., Li, W., Zhang, T., Han, Q. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: DHF-TOPSIS · CIMAS. Consultato il 2026-06-18 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare