Confronta i metodi

	Salto con contromovimento	Profilo Forza-Velocità
Campo	Scienze dello sport	Scienze dello sport
Famiglia	Hypothesis test	Hypothesis test
Anno di origine	1983	2007
Ideatore	Paavo Komi	Biomechanics Research Group
Tipo	jumping test	mechanical profiling
Fonte seminale	Bosco, C., Luhtanen, P., & Komi, P. V. (1983). A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 50(2), 273-282.	Bampouras, T. M., Comyns, T. M., Daly, D. J., & Deighan, M. A. (2007). Comparison of the Wingate test and an isokinetic anaerobic test in recreationally active children. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(12), 822-825.
Alias	CMJ, jump height, explosive power	FVP, force-velocity curve, power profile, strength-speed balance
Correlati	3	5
Sintesi	The counter-movement jump (CMJ) is a simple, field-friendly test of lower-body explosive power in which the athlete stands on a force plate, descends into a shallow squat (counter-movement phase), and explosively extends to jump as high as possible. Pioneered by Bosco and Komi (1983), the CMJ captures the integrated function of strength, rate of force development, and elastic energy utilization. Jump height (measured via flight time from force plate or motion capture) and peak power are reported. The CMJ is among the most widely used tests in sports science, athlete monitoring, and research due to simplicity, objectivity, and relevance to explosive power in nearly all sports.	The force-velocity profile characterizes an individual's mechanical properties across the force-velocity spectrum, revealing whether strength advantage lies in maximal force production or high-velocity power output. Formalized by Samozino and colleagues (2012), the FVP is derived from multiple load-velocity measurements (typically sprint starts, jumps, or push-off movements at various resistances) and mathematically modeled as a linear inverse relationship between force and velocity, anchored by maximal power. Athletes differ markedly in their FVP: some excel at moving heavy loads slowly (force-dominant), while others excel at moving light loads fast (velocity-dominant). Profiling identifies these phenotypes and informs targeted training interventions.