Comparative Historical Analysis
Comparative historical analysis (CHA) is a macro-causal research tradition that explains large-scale outcomes — revolutions, regime change, welfare states, development paths — by systematically comparing a small number of cases reconstructed in depth across historical time. It combines cross-case comparison with close attention to temporality: sequences, timing, critical junctures, and path dependence. Associated with Barrington Moore, Theda Skocpol, and codified by Mahoney and Rueschemeyer, CHA treats history not as background but as the medium through which causes operate.
Baca metode selengkapnya
Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.
Peta metode
Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.
Sumber
- Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.) (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521016452
- Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521294997
Cara menyitasi halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Comparative Historical Analysis (Macro-Causal Comparison of Cases over Time). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/political-science/comparative-historical-analysis
Metode yang mana?
Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.
- Most Different Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ bandingkan
- Most Similar Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ bandingkan
- Process TracingPsikometri↔ bandingkan
- Qualitative Comparative AnalysisPolitical Science↔ bandingkan
Dirujuk oleh
Metode serupa
Menemukan masalah di halaman ini? Laporkan atau usulkan perbaikan →