System Justification Scale
The System Justification Scale operationalizes system justification theory, introduced by Jost and Banaji (1994), which holds that people are motivated to defend, bolster, and rationalize the existing social, economic, and political status quo, even when doing so runs against their personal or group interest. The general version, refined by Kay and Jost (2003), is an 8-item self-report measure on which respondents rate agreement with statements such as 'In general, the American political system operates as it should' on a 7- or 9-point Likert scale.
Baca metode selengkapnya
Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.
Peta metode
Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.
Sumber
- Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x ↗
- Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of poor but happy and poor but honest stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823-837. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823 ↗
Cara menyitasi halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). System Justification Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/political-psychology/system-justification-scale
Metode yang mana?
Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.
- Skala Dukungan DemokrasiPsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
- Skala Ideologi PolitikPsikologi Politik↔ bandingkan
- Skala Otoritarianisme Sayap KananPsikologi Sosial↔ bandingkan
- Skala Orientasi Dominasi SosialPsikologi Sosial↔ bandingkan
Dirujuk oleh
Metode serupa
Menemukan masalah di halaman ini? Laporkan atau usulkan perbaikan →