Spatial Conflict Analysis
Spatial conflict analysis models armed conflict while taking geography seriously: conflict is not randomly scattered but clusters in space, and a place's risk depends on its neighbors. Building on georeferenced data and spatial-statistical methods — as in Ward and Gleditsch's (2002) MCMC approach to the spatial context of war and peace — it uses spatial weights, tests for spatial autocorrelation, and fits spatial regression models so that conflict, peace, and their predictors are analyzed as interdependent across locations rather than as isolated observations.
Baca metode selengkapnya
Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.
Peta metode
Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.
Sumber
- Ward, M. D., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2002). Location, location, location: An MCMC approach to modeling the spatial context of war and peace. Political Analysis, 10(3), 244–260. DOI: 10.1093/pan/10.3.244 ↗
Cara menyitasi halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Spatial Analysis and Modeling of Armed Conflict. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/international-relations/spatial-conflict-analysis
Metode yang mana?
Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.
- Conflict Diffusion AnalysisInternational Relations↔ bandingkan
- Regresi Spasial (Model Lag Spasial dan Error Spasial)Ekonometrika↔ bandingkan
- UCDP Conflict Data AnalysisInternational Relations↔ bandingkan
Dirujuk oleh
Metode serupa
Konsep rujukan terkait
Menemukan masalah di halaman ini? Laporkan atau usulkan perbaikan →