Bandingkan metode

	Penilaian Debriefing untuk Simulasi dalam Layanan Kesehatan (DASH)	Kuesioner Praktik Reflektif (RPQ)
Bidang	Pendidikan Kesehatan	Pendidikan Kesehatan
Keluarga	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Tahun asal	2006	2000–2005
Pencetus	Jeffrey W. Rudolph, Robert Simon, Daniel B. Raemer	Sobral, D. T.; Saarikoski et al.
Tipe	Self-report observer-rated scale	Self-report questionnaire
Sumber perintis	Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Dufresne, R. L., & Raemer, D. B. (2006). There's no such thing as 'nonjudgmental' debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc 1(1): 49–55.	Sobral, D. T. (2000). An appraisal of medical students' reflection-in-action. Med Educ 34(3): 182–187.
Alias	DASH Scale, Simulation Debriefing Assessment, Debriefing Feedback Scale	Reflection Questionnaire, Reflective Learning Scale
Terkait	4	4
Ringkasan	The DASH is a 20-item observer-rated instrument measuring the quality of debriefing—the structured, facilitated reflection following a healthcare simulation activity. Developed by Rudolph, Simon, and Raemer in 2006 at Massachusetts General Hospital, the DASH evaluates the debriefing facilitator's ability to create a psychological safety environment, elicit reflection on events, establish learning objectives, and foster insight into clinical decision-making. The scale is widely used in medical and nursing education to assess the fidelity and effectiveness of simulation-based learning experiences.	The RPQ is a self-report instrument measuring the degree to which healthcare students and professionals engage in reflective practice—the deliberate examination of their clinical experiences, decisions, and actions to extract learning and improve future practice. Developed by Sobral and refined by Saarikoski and colleagues in the early 2000s, the RPQ assesses both the frequency and depth of reflection, including reflection-in-action (thinking while performing) and reflection-on-action (analyzing after the fact). The scale is used in nursing and medical education to evaluate whether students are developing critical thinking and self-directed learning habits that sustain professional growth.