ScholarGate
Asszisztens

Módszerek összehasonlítása

Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.

Spatial Coarsened Exact Matching×Tárgyhajlamossági pontszám illesztés×
TudományterületOksági következtetésKutatási statisztika
MódszercsaládRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Keletkezés éve2012 (CEM foundation); spatial extension in applied literature 2015-present1983
MegalkotóIacus, King & Porro (CEM foundation, 2012); extended to spatial contexts by applied spatial econometriciansPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TípusQuasi-experimental matching estimator with spatial covariatesMethod
AlapműIacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Alternatív nevekSpatial CEM, Geographic CEM, Spatial exact matching, CEM with spatial covariatesPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Kapcsolódó63
ÖsszefoglalóSpatial Coarsened Exact Matching applies the Coarsened Exact Matching framework to study designs involving geographic units — neighbourhoods, census tracts, municipalities, or grid cells. Covariates are coarsened into discrete bins and units are matched exactly on those bins, with spatial attributes (location, adjacency, geographic characteristics) incorporated as matching dimensions to control for spatial confounding.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateAdatkészlet
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Források
  3. PUBLISHED

Ugrás a kereséshez Diák letöltése

ScholarGateMódszerek összehasonlítása: Spatial Coarsened Exact Matching · Propensity Score Matching. Letöltve 2026-06-19, forrás: https://scholargate.app/hu/compare