ScholarGate
Asszisztens

Módszerek összehasonlítása

Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.

Kockázattal korrigált kompetáló kockázatok elemzése×Tárgyhajlamossági pontszám illesztés×
TudományterületEpidemiológiaKutatási statisztika
MódszercsaládProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Keletkezés éve1999 (subdistribution hazard model); cause-specific hazard framework earlier1983
MegalkotóJason Fine and Robert GrayPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TípusRegression model for time-to-event data with competing eventsMethod
AlapműFine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Alternatív nevekcompeting risks regression, subdistribution hazard model, cause-specific hazard analysis, Fine-Gray modelPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Kapcsolódó43
ÖsszefoglalóRisk-adjusted competing risks analysis extends classical survival analysis to settings where subjects can experience more than one type of terminal event, and where the occurrence of one event prevents the occurrence of another. By modelling cause-specific or subdistribution hazards while adjusting for measured confounders, the method yields unbiased estimates of the absolute probability — the cumulative incidence function — of each event type over time in the presence of competing events.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateAdatkészlet
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Források
  3. PUBLISHED

Ugrás a kereséshez Diák letöltése

ScholarGateMódszerek összehasonlítása: Risk-adjusted competing risks analysis · Propensity Score Matching. Letöltve 2026-06-18, forrás: https://scholargate.app/hu/compare