Módszerek összehasonlítása
Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.
| Qualitative Comparative Analysis× | Most Different Systems Design× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tudományterület | Political Science | Political Science |
| Módszercsalád | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Keletkezés éve≠ | 1987 | 1970 |
| Megalkotó≠ | Charles C. Ragin | John Stuart Mill (method of agreement); Przeworski & Teune (systems framing) |
| Típus≠ | Set-theoretic, configurational comparative method | Small-N comparative case-selection design |
| Alapmű≠ | Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN: 9780520058347 | Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 9780471701422 |
| Alternatív nevek | QCA, csQCA, fsQCA, Configurational comparative method | MDSD, Most different cases design, Mill's method of agreement, Diverse systems design |
| Kapcsolódó | 3 | 3 |
| Összefoglaló≠ | Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a set-theoretic, configurational method that identifies which combinations of conditions are necessary or sufficient for an outcome across a set of cases. Developed by Charles Ragin, it treats each case as a configuration of set memberships, builds a truth table of all logically possible combinations, and uses Boolean algebra to minimize them into the simplest expressions that account for the outcome. It bridges qualitative case knowledge and cross-case generalization, embracing causal complexity through conjunctural causation, equifinality, and asymmetry. | The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics. |
| ScholarGateAdatkészlet ↗ |
|
|