ScholarGate
Asszisztens

Módszerek összehasonlítása

Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.

Politikai értékelés inverz valószínűségi súlyozással×Tárgyhajlamossági pontszám illesztés×
TudományterületOksági következtetésKutatási statisztika
MódszercsaládRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Keletkezés éve1952 (IPW origin); 2000s (policy evaluation application)1983
MegalkotóHorvitz & Thompson (1952); extended to causal policy settings by Robins, Hernan & Brumback (2000) and Imbens & Wooldridge (2009)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TípusReweighting estimator for causal policy analysisMethod
AlapműImbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5-86. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Alternatív nevekIPW policy evaluation, propensity-weighted policy analysis, inverse probability of treatment weightingPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Kapcsolódó63
ÖsszefoglalóPolicy evaluation inverse probability weighting (IPW) uses estimated propensity scores to reweight observed units so that the weighted sample mimics a randomised experiment. Each unit is weighted by the inverse of its probability of receiving the policy, creating a pseudo-population in which treatment assignment is independent of observed covariates and the average treatment effect (ATE) can be read off directly.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateAdatkészlet
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Források
  3. PUBLISHED

Ugrás a kereséshez Diák letöltése

ScholarGateMódszerek összehasonlítása: Policy Evaluation Inverse Probability Weighting · Propensity Score Matching. Letöltve 2026-06-19, forrás: https://scholargate.app/hu/compare