ScholarGate
Asszisztens

Módszerek összehasonlítása

Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.

Innovation Ambidexterity Scale×[HUNGARIAN TRANSLATION MISSING - THIS ITEM IS NOT TRANSLATED]×
TudományterületStratégiai menedzsmentStratégiai menedzsment
MódszercsaládProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Keletkezés éve19912002
MegalkotóJames G. MarchShaker Zahra and Gerard George
TípusOrganizational self-report questionnaireOrganizational self-report questionnaire
AlapműMarch, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. DOI ↗Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. DOI ↗
Alternatív nevekAmbidexterity Scale, Exploration-Exploitation ScaleACAP, Zahra-George Scale
Kapcsolódó55
ÖsszefoglalóInnovation Ambidexterity—the organizational capacity to simultaneously engage in exploration (pursuing radical, novel innovations) and exploitation (improving and extending existing products and processes)—is fundamental to sustained competitive advantage. March (1991) formalized this trade-off in Organization Science, arguing that organizations must balance the two to survive and thrive. Exploration alone leads to variety but insufficient returns; exploitation alone leads to competence traps and vulnerability to disruption. This scale, operationalized by He and Wong (2004) and extended by Jansen et al. (2006), measures organizational capability in both domains and the degree to which firms balance competing innovation imperatives.Absorptive Capacity (ACAP) refers to an organization's ability to acquire, assimilate, transform, and exploit external knowledge to enhance innovation and performance. Zahra and George (2002) reconceptualized absorptive capacity into four distinct but interrelated processes in their foundational Academy of Management Review article. This measurement scale captures organizational learning dynamics and knowledge-based competitive advantage, making it essential for assessing innovation capability and knowledge management effectiveness.
ScholarGateAdatkészlet
  1. v1
  2. 3 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Források
  3. PUBLISHED

Ugrás a kereséshez Diák letöltése

ScholarGateMódszerek összehasonlítása: Innovation Ambidexterity Scale · Absorptive Capacity Scale. Letöltve 2026-06-19, forrás: https://scholargate.app/hu/compare