ScholarGate
Asszisztens

Módszerek összehasonlítása

Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.

A heterogén kezelési hatás kontrafaktuális hatásbecslése×Tárgyhajlamossági pontszám illesztés×
TudományterületOksági következtetésKutatási statisztika
MódszercsaládRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Keletkezés éve2010s1983
MegalkotóCerulli (2010) for CIE framework; Athey & Wager (2019) for causal forest-based CATE within CIEPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TípusQuasi-experimental causal inference with subgroup heterogeneityMethod
AlapműCerulli, G. (2010). Modelling and measuring the effect of public subsidies on business R&D: A critical review of the econometric literature. Economic Record, 86(274), 421-449. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Alternatív nevekHTE-CIE, heterogeneous CIE, CATE-based counterfactual evaluation, subgroup counterfactual impact evaluationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Kapcsolódó43
ÖsszefoglalóHeterogeneous Treatment Effect Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (HTE-CIE) extends standard counterfactual impact evaluation by estimating how the causal effect of a policy or intervention varies across subgroups defined by pre-treatment characteristics. Rather than reporting a single average treatment effect, it maps the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) across the covariate space, revealing who benefits most or least from an intervention.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateAdatkészlet
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Források
  3. PUBLISHED

Ugrás a kereséshez Diák letöltése

ScholarGateMódszerek összehasonlítása: Heterogeneous treatment effect Counterfactual impact evaluation · Propensity Score Matching. Letöltve 2026-06-20, forrás: https://scholargate.app/hu/compare