ScholarGate
Asszisztens

Módszerek összehasonlítása

Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.

Computerized adaptive test discriminant validity×A konstruktumvaliditás a számítógépes adaptív tesztelésben (CAT)×
TudományterületPszichometriaPszichometria
MódszercsaládLatent structureLatent structure
Keletkezés éve1959 (discriminant validity); CAT application from 1990s onward1989–2000s
MegalkotóCampbell & Fiske (discriminant validity framework); applied to CAT by educational measurement researchersSamuel Messick (unified validity framework); CAT application formalized by Wainer, van der Linden, and colleagues
TípusValidity evaluation techniqueValidity evaluation / psychometric evidence gathering
AlapműWeiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(2), 70–84. DOI ↗Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education / Macmillan. link ↗
Alternatív nevekCAT discriminant validity, adaptive test divergent validity, CAT scale differentiation, CAT construct separationCAT construct validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, construct validity evidence in CAT
Kapcsolódó56
ÖsszefoglalóDiscriminant validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is the evaluation process confirming that a CAT-administered scale measures its intended construct distinctly from related but conceptually different constructs. Despite the adaptive item-selection mechanism varying each respondent's item set, evidence must be provided that CAT-derived scores do not overlap excessively with scores from theoretically distinct scales.Construct validity in computerized adaptive testing evaluates whether the latent trait estimates produced by a CAT instrument genuinely measure the intended psychological or educational construct. Because adaptive algorithms select items individually for each examinee, the validity evidence gathered must account for the variable item exposure and the IRT-based scoring that are unique to CAT administrations.
ScholarGateAdatkészlet
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED

Ugrás a kereséshez Diák letöltése

ScholarGateMódszerek összehasonlítása: Computerized adaptive test discriminant validity · Computerized adaptive test construct validity. Letöltve 2026-06-15, forrás: https://scholargate.app/hu/compare