ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineDigital controversy cartography

Web Controversy Analysis

Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.

Otvorite u MethodMindUskoroPrimijenite, usporedite, dobijte smjernice
Alati i resursi
Preuzmi prezentaciju
Učenje i istraživanje
VideoUskoro

Pročitajte cijelu metodu

Samo za članove

Prijavite se besplatnim računom kako biste pročitali ovaj odjeljak.

Prijavite se

Karta metoda

Okruženje srodnih metoda — odaberite čvor za istraživanje.

Izvori

  1. Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558
  2. Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655-686. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915574602

Kako citirati ovu stranicu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Web-Based Controversy Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hr/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis

Koja metoda?

Postavite ovu metodu uz njoj najsrodnije i pročitajte ih jednu uz drugu — knjižnica vam knjige stavlja na stol; izbor je na vama.

Usporedi jedno uz drugo

Citirana u

ScholarGateWeb Controversy Analysis (Web-Based Controversy Analysis). Preuzeto 2026-06-24 s https://scholargate.app/hr/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis · Skup podataka: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026