ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineSociology of scientific knowledge

Boundary-Work Analysis

Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.

Otvorite u MethodMindUskoroPrimijenite, usporedite, dobijte smjernice
Alati i resursi
Preuzmi prezentaciju
Učenje i istraživanje
VideoUskoro

Pročitajte cijelu metodu

Samo za članove

Prijavite se besplatnim računom kako biste pročitali ovaj odjeljak.

Prijavite se

Karta metoda

Okruženje srodnih metoda — odaberite čvor za istraživanje.

Izvori

  1. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325
  2. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625

Kako citirati ovu stranicu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hr/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis

Koja metoda?

Postavite ovu metodu uz njoj najsrodnije i pročitajte ih jednu uz drugu — knjižnica vam knjige stavlja na stol; izbor je na vama.

Usporedi jedno uz drugo

Citirana u

ScholarGateBoundary-Work Analysis (Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science)). Preuzeto 2026-06-24 s https://scholargate.app/hr/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis · Skup podataka: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026