Summative Evaluation
Summative evaluation is evaluation conducted to render an overall judgement of a program, policy or product — its merit, worth, effectiveness or impact — typically after it has been implemented or has matured. Named by Michael Scriven in his 1967 essay 'The Methodology of Evaluation' as the counterpart to formative evaluation, its purpose is to inform consequential decisions: whether to continue, expand, replicate, defund or certify an intervention. It addresses the bottom-line question 'did it work, and was it worth it?' for audiences such as funders, policymakers and the public.
Pročitajte cijelu metodu
Prijavite se besplatnim računom kako biste pročitali ovaj odjeljak.
Karta metoda
Okruženje srodnih metoda — odaberite čvor za istraživanje.
Izvori
- Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago: Rand McNally. ISBN: 9780528616600
Kako citirati ovu stranicu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Summative Evaluation of Program Merit and Worth. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hr/public-policy/summative-evaluation
Koja metoda?
Postavite ovu metodu uz njoj najsrodnije i pročitajte ih jednu uz drugu — knjižnica vam knjige stavlja na stol; izbor je na vama.
- Kontrafaktualna evaluacija učinka (CIE)Uzročno zaključivanje↔ usporedi
- Formative EvaluationPublic Policy↔ usporedi
- Impact Evaluation DesignPublic Policy↔ usporedi
- Process EvaluationPublic Policy↔ usporedi
Citirana u
Slične metode
Uočili ste pogrešku na ovoj stranici? Prijavite je ili predložite ispravak →