ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineSurvey / expert elicitation

Policy Delphi

The policy Delphi is a structured, iterative technique for eliciting and organising informed opinion on contested policy issues. Unlike the classical Delphi, which seeks consensus on a forecast, the policy Delphi is explicitly designed to generate the strongest possible opposing positions on a policy question and to expose the full range of options, supporting arguments and disagreements among a panel of knowledgeable stakeholders. Introduced by Murray Turoff in 1970, it conducts several anonymous rounds in which participants rate policy statements on dimensions such as desirability and feasibility, see aggregated feedback and the reasoning behind divergent views, and revise their positions — surfacing structured intelligence for decision-makers rather than a forced agreement.

Otvorite u MethodMindUskoroPrimijenite, usporedite, dobijte smjernice
Alati i resursi
Preuzmi prezentaciju
Učenje i istraživanje
VideoUskoro

Pročitajte cijelu metodu

Samo za članove

Prijavite se besplatnim računom kako biste pročitali ovaj odjeljak.

Prijavite se

Karta metoda

Okruženje srodnih metoda — odaberite čvor za istraživanje.

Izvori

  1. Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149–171. DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7
  2. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.) (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN: 9780201042948

Kako citirati ovu stranicu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Policy Delphi Method for Structured Expert Deliberation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hr/public-policy/policy-delphi

Koja metoda?

Postavite ovu metodu uz njoj najsrodnije i pročitajte ih jednu uz drugu — knjižnica vam knjige stavlja na stol; izbor je na vama.

Usporedi jedno uz drugo

Citirana u

ScholarGatePolicy Delphi (Policy Delphi Method for Structured Expert Deliberation). Preuzeto 2026-06-24 s https://scholargate.app/hr/public-policy/policy-delphi · Skup podataka: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026