Most Different Systems Design
The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics.
Pročitajte cijelu metodu
Prijavite se besplatnim računom kako biste pročitali ovaj odjeljak.
Karta metoda
Okruženje srodnih metoda — odaberite čvor za istraživanje.
Izvori
- Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 9780471701422
- Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. DOI: 10.1177/1065912907313077 ↗
- Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521676564
Kako citirati ovu stranicu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Most Different Systems Design (Comparative Method of Agreement). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hr/political-science/most-different-systems-design
Koja metoda?
Postavite ovu metodu uz njoj najsrodnije i pročitajte ih jednu uz drugu — knjižnica vam knjige stavlja na stol; izbor je na vama.
- Most Similar Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ usporedi
- Praćenje procesaPsihometrija↔ usporedi
- Qualitative Comparative AnalysisPolitical Science↔ usporedi
Citirana u
Slične metode
Uočili ste pogrešku na ovoj stranici? Prijavite je ili predložite ispravak →