Democratic Norms Support Measurement
This approach measures how committed ordinary citizens are to democratic norms by observing the price they are willing to pay to uphold them. Rather than asking abstractly whether people value democracy, Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik's 2020 candidate-choice design confronts voters with a co-partisan candidate who violates a democratic principle and estimates how much electoral support that violation costs. Their finding that most Americans will tolerate undemocratic behavior by their own side when partisanship and policy stakes are high reframed the study of democratic backsliding around revealed, not professed, commitment. Christopher Claassen's parallel work links aggregate diffuse support for democracy to whether democracies survive.
Pročitajte cijelu metodu
Prijavite se besplatnim računom kako biste pročitali ovaj odjeljak.
Karta metoda
Okruženje srodnih metoda — odaberite čvor za istraživanje.
Izvori
- Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392-409. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000052 ↗
- Claassen, C. (2020). Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive? American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118-134. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12452 ↗
Kako citirati ovu stranicu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Measuring Mass Support for Democratic Norms (Candidate-Choice Tradeoff Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hr/political-psychology/democratic-norms-support-scale
Koja metoda?
Postavite ovu metodu uz njoj najsrodnije i pročitajte ih jednu uz drugu — knjižnica vam knjige stavlja na stol; izbor je na vama.
- Elite Cue ExperimentPolitička psihologija↔ usporedi
- Ljestvica političkog povjerenjaPolitička psihologija↔ usporedi
- Support for Political Violence MeasurePolitička psihologija↔ usporedi
Citirana u
Slične metode
Uočili ste pogrešku na ovoj stranici? Prijavite je ili predložite ispravak →