ScholarGate
Asistent

Usporedite metode

Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Evaluacija probira×Dizajn studije dijagnostičke točnosti×
PodručjeEpidemiologijaKlinička istraživanja
ObiteljProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s2003-2015
TvoracWilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluationBossuyt, Reitsma, and STARD group (2003); clinical epidemiology pioneers
VrstaObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation designResearch Design
Temeljni izvorWilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), 40–44. DOI ↗
Drugi naziviscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STEdiagnostic accuracy study, test accuracy, STARD, diagnostic evaluation
Srodne62
SažetakScreening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.A diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a new diagnostic test (or biomarker, imaging modality, clinical assessment) detects the presence or absence of disease compared to a reference standard (gold standard). Standardized since 2003 by the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) initiative, diagnostic accuracy studies are fundamental to clinical medicine, determining whether and how new tests can improve patient diagnosis and treatment.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretraživanje Preuzmi prezentaciju

ScholarGateUsporedite metode: Screening Test Evaluation · Diagnostic Accuracy Study Design. Preuzeto 2026-06-17 s https://scholargate.app/hr/compare