ScholarGate
Asistent

Usporedite metode

Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Propensity Weighting in Criminology×Uteživanje inverznom vjerojatnošću tretmana (IPW / IPTW)×
PodručjeCriminologyUzročno zaključivanje
ObiteljProcess / pipelineRegression model
Godina nastanka19832000
TvoracPaul R. Rosenbaum & Donald B. Rubin (propensity score); Robert Apel & Gary Sweeten (criminological adaptation)Robins, Hernán & Brumback
VrstaObservational causal estimator for justice exposuresCausal inference weighting estimator
Temeljni izvorApel, R. J., & Sweeten, G. (2010). Propensity score matching in criminology and criminal justice. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Criminology (pp. 543–562). Springer. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
Drugi naziviIPTW for Justice Exposures, Inverse-Probability Weighting in Criminology, Propensity-Weighted Crime Effects, Observational Treatment-Effect WeightingIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
Srodne45
SažetakPropensity weighting estimates the causal effect of a justice exposure — incarceration, gang membership, a program, or a sanction — from observational data when randomization was impossible. It models each unit's probability of receiving the exposure given measured confounders (the propensity score) and then weights units by the inverse of that probability, creating a pseudo-population in which the exposure is unrelated to those confounders. Rosenbaum and Rubin introduced the propensity score in 1983, and Apel and Sweeten adapted it for criminology, where ethical and practical barriers make experiments rare.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretraživanje Preuzmi prezentaciju

ScholarGateUsporedite metode: Propensity Weighting in Criminology · Inverse Probability Weighting. Preuzeto 2026-06-25 s https://scholargate.app/hr/compare