Usporedite metode
Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.
| Pragmatični eksperimentalni nacrt s pret-post testiranjem× | Pragmatično randomizirano kontrolirano ispitivanje× | |
|---|---|---|
| Područje | Eksperimentalni dizajn | Eksperimentalni dizajn |
| Obitelj | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Godina nastanka≠ | 1963 (pre-post design); 1967 (pragmatic distinction) | 1967 |
| Tvorac≠ | Schwartz & Lellouch (pragmatic framing); Campbell & Stanley (pre-post design) | Daniel Schwartz and Joseph Lellouch |
| Vrsta≠ | Experimental / quasi-experimental design | Experimental design — pragmatic trial |
| Temeljni izvor≠ | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637-648. DOI ↗ | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗ |
| Drugi nazivi | pragmatic pre-post design, real-world pretest-posttest study, effectiveness pre-post design, pragmatic before-after study | pRCT, pragmatic trial, practical clinical trial, real-world RCT |
| Srodne≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Sažetak≠ | A pragmatic pretest-posttest experimental design combines the before-after measurement structure of the classic pre-post design with the real-world, high-external-validity ethos of pragmatic research. Participants are assessed on relevant outcomes before an intervention is delivered in routine or naturalistic conditions, then re-assessed afterward. The goal is to estimate the effectiveness of the intervention as it actually works in practice rather than under ideal, tightly controlled efficacy conditions. | A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) tests whether an intervention works under ordinary, real-world conditions — broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and routine care settings. Participants are still randomly assigned to treatment or control, preserving causal inference, but the study is designed to reflect the diversity and variability of actual practice rather than the ideal conditions of an explanatory trial. The defining framework is the PRECIS-2 tool, which maps any RCT along nine pragmatic-to-explanatory dimensions. |
| ScholarGateSkup podataka ↗ |
|
|