Usporedite metode
Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.
| Dnevnik pilot-testiranog eksperimenta× | Prikupljanje dokumenata× | |
|---|---|---|
| Područje | Metodologija anketa | Metodologija anketa |
| Obitelj | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Godina nastanka≠ | 19th–20th century (lab notebooks); pilot-testing conventions codified mid-20th century | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s |
| Tvorac≠ | Scientific research community (laboratory practice); pilot-testing formalized by survey and experimental methodologists | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen |
| Vrsta≠ | Instrument-validation + structured data collection | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique |
| Temeljni izvor≠ | Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. DOI ↗ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ |
| Drugi nazivi | pilot-tested lab journal, pilot-tested research logbook, validated experiment diary, pre-tested lab log | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis |
| Srodne≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Sažetak≠ | A pilot-tested experiment log is a structured research instrument — a systematic journal of experimental procedures, observations, and results — that has been trialed with a small representative sample before full deployment. The pilot phase identifies ambiguous recording fields, impractical time demands, or inconsistent terminology, enabling targeted revisions that improve the log's reliability and completeness before the main data-collection phase begins. | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. |
| ScholarGateSkup podataka ↗ |
|
|