ScholarGate
Asistent

Usporedite metode

Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Inter-Indexer Consistency×TREC Pooling and Relevance Judgments×
PodručjeLibrary Information ScienceLibrary Information Science
ObiteljProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka19692005
TvoracPranas Zunde & Margaret Dexter; L. Rolling (Hooper coefficient tradition)Ellen M. Voorhees & Donna K. Harman (NIST TREC)
VrstaAgreement measurement for index-term assignmentPooled relevance-assessment pipeline for large test collections
Temeljni izvorRolling, L. (1981). Indexing consistency, quality and efficiency. Information Processing & Management, 17(2), 69-76. DOI ↗Voorhees, E. M., & Harman, D. K. (Eds.). (2005). TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262220736
Drugi naziviIndexer Agreement, Inter-Indexer Agreement, Hooper Consistency, Indexing ReliabilityPooling Method, Depth Pooling, TREC Pooling, Pooled Relevance Assessment
Srodne33
SažetakInter-indexer consistency measures how far two or more people agree when they independently assign subject terms to the same documents. Because subject indexing is a judgment task — choosing which descriptors best represent a document's content — different indexers routinely pick overlapping but not identical term sets, and the degree of that overlap is a fundamental indicator of the reliability of an indexing system. The standard quantity is the Hooper-style consistency coefficient, the size of the shared term set divided by the size of the combined term set, averaged across documents; Zunde and Dexter and later Rolling refined it and connected it to indexing quality. Low consistency signals that retrieval will be unpredictable, since whether a document is found can depend on which indexer happened to process it.Pooling is the technique that lets the Cranfield evaluation paradigm scale to collections of millions of documents, where judging every document for every topic is impossible. Developed and institutionalized at the US National Institute of Standards and Technology for the Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), pooling gathers the top-ranked documents returned by many participating systems for each topic, merges them into a single pool, has human assessors judge only that pool, and treats every unjudged document as non-relevant. The result is a reusable test collection — documents, topics, and pooled relevance judgments (qrels) — on which new systems can later be scored without further assessment. Pooling is what made large-scale, reproducible retrieval evaluation feasible.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretraživanje Preuzmi prezentaciju

ScholarGateUsporedite metode: Inter-Indexer Consistency · TREC Pooling and Relevance Judgments. Preuzeto 2026-06-25 s https://scholargate.app/hr/compare