ScholarGate
Asistent

Usporedite metode

Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Integrirano određivanje težina objektivnih kriterija×Metoda rangiranja s reciročnim redom uz dva koraka normalizacije×
PodručjeDonošenje odlukaDonošenje odluka
ObiteljMCDMMCDM
Godina nastanka20122022
TvoracZavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
VrstaIntegrated objective weighting (ENTROPY × CILOS product-normalisation)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Temeljni izvorZavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2012). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making link ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Drugi nazivi
Srodne88
SažetakIDOCRIW (Integrated Determination of Objective CRIteria Weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 1 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretraživanje Preuzmi prezentaciju

ScholarGateUsporedite metode: IDOCRIW · AROMAN. Preuzeto 2026-06-19 s https://scholargate.app/hr/compare