ScholarGate
Asistent

Usporedite metode

Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Sadržajna valjanost×Diskriminantna valjanost×
PodručjePsihometrijaPsihometrija
ObiteljLatent structureLatent structure
Godina nastanka19751959
TvoracC. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurementDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
VrstaValidity evidence / expert judgement procedureValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Temeljni izvorLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Drugi nazivicontent-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Srodne65
SažetakContent validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretraživanje Preuzmi prezentaciju

ScholarGateUsporedite metode: Content Validity · Discriminant Validity. Preuzeto 2026-06-15 s https://scholargate.app/hr/compare