ScholarGate
Asistent

Usporedite metode

Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Sadržajna valjanost u kompjuteriziranom adaptivnom testiranju (CAT)×Konstruktna valjanost×
PodručjePsihometrijaPsihometrija
ObiteljLatent structureLatent structure
Godina nastanka1975 / 19801955
TvoracLawshe (content validity); Lord & Weiss (CAT framework)Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
VrstaValidity evaluation / test designValidity evaluation framework
Temeljni izvorLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
Drugi naziviCAT content validity, adaptive item bank content coverage, content balancing in CAT, CAT blueprint validityconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Srodne66
SažetakContent validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) ensures that an adaptively administered assessment adequately samples the intended content domain despite delivering only a subset of items to each examinee. It integrates classical content validity methods with CAT-specific item bank design and content balancing algorithms to guarantee representative domain coverage at both the item bank and the individual test level.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretraživanje Download slides

ScholarGateUsporedite metode: Computerized Adaptive Test Content Validity · Construct Validity. Preuzeto 2026-06-15 s https://scholargate.app/hr/compare