Usporedite metode

	Analiza sudske prakse	Doktrinarno pravno istraživanje
Područje	Terenske metode	Terenske metode
Obitelj	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Godina nastanka	Medieval English common law; academic formalisation 19th–20th century	19th century (systematised ~1860s–1880s in common law jurisdictions)
Tvorac	Common law tradition (England); systematised in Anglo-American jurisprudence	Common law tradition; systematised by jurists such as A.V. Dicey and John Austin
Vrsta	Qualitative legal research method	Legal-analytical research method
Temeljni izvor	Hutchinson, T. (2010). Researching and Writing in Law (3rd ed.). Thomson Reuters. ISBN: 9780455227689	Hutchinson, T. (2013). Researching and Writing in Law (3rd ed.). Thomson Reuters. ISBN: 9780455229829
Drugi nazivi	judicial decision analysis, legal case analysis, jurisprudential analysis, case-based legal research	black-letter law research, legal doctrine analysis, analytical jurisprudence, traditional legal scholarship
Srodne	6	6
Sažetak	Case law analysis is a systematic method for examining judicial decisions to identify binding legal rules, evolving doctrines, and interpretive trends. Rooted in the common law tradition of stare decisis, it requires the researcher to locate the ratio decidendi — the binding reasoning — of each decision, distinguish it from obiter dicta, and trace how that reasoning has been applied, distinguished, or overruled across subsequent cases. The method is fundamental to legal scholarship, litigation strategy, and law reform research.	Doctrinal legal research is the foundational methodology of legal scholarship. It systematically identifies, reads, and analyses authoritative legal sources — statutes, case law, constitutional texts, and regulations — to describe, explain, and critique the content and internal logic of legal doctrine. By working within the accepted hierarchy of legal sources, it answers the question 'What is the law?' with analytical rigour and interpretive precision, producing descriptions of settled doctrine and arguments for how ambiguities should be resolved.