ScholarGate
Asistent

Usporedite metode

Pregledajte odabrane metode jednu uz drugu; retci koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Blockmodeling×Dyadic Analysis×Homophily Analysis×
PodručjeSociologySociologySociology
ObiteljProcess / pipelineRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka197619811954 (concept); 2001 (synthesis)
TvoracHarrison White, Scott Boorman & Ronald BreigerHolland & Leinhardt (p1); Kenny (Social Relations Model)Lazarsfeld & Merton (concept); McPherson, Smith-Lovin & Cook (synthesis)
VrstaNetwork partitioning into positions and a reduced role structureAnalysis of the dyad as the unit, decomposing relational effectsMeasurement of similarity-based tie formation
Temeljni izvorWhite, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–780. DOI ↗Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 33–50. DOI ↗McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. DOI ↗
Drugi naziviblock modeling, blockmodel analysis, generalized blockmodeling, CONCORdyad analysis, dyadic data analysis, social relations model, dyad censushomophily measurement, assortative mixing analysis, birds-of-a-feather analysis, tie-similarity analysis
Srodne444
SažetakBlockmodeling is a family of methods that simplify a social network by partitioning its actors into positions — groups of actors who are equivalent in their pattern of ties — and summarizing the relations between positions as a compact image, or reduced role structure. Introduced by Harrison White, Scott Boorman, and Ronald Breiger in 1976, it shifts attention from individuals to the structural roles they occupy.Dyadic analysis treats the dyad — the pair of actors and the relation between them — as the unit of analysis, separating the relational outcome into what each actor brings to all their relationships and what is unique to the specific pair. It spans the descriptive dyad census of network analysis and statistical frameworks such as Holland and Leinhardt's p1 model and Kenny's Social Relations Model, all of which respect the structural non-independence inherent in relational data.Homophily analysis quantifies the tendency of similar individuals to form ties — the principle that 'birds of a feather flock together'. It compares the rate at which people connect with others who share an attribute (race, gender, age, education, attitudes) against what would be expected by chance, distinguishing the homophily that arises merely from group sizes from the genuine, behavior-driven preference for similar others.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretraživanje Preuzmi prezentaciju

ScholarGateUsporedite metode: Blockmodeling · Dyadic Analysis · Homophily Analysis. Preuzeto 2026-06-25 s https://scholargate.app/hr/compare