Misinformation Correction Experiment
A misinformation correction experiment tests whether a factual correction can reduce belief in a political misperception. In Nyhan and Reifler's influential 2010 design, all respondents read a misleading claim and a random subset also read a correction, after which their factual beliefs are measured. Their alarming finding was a backfire effect: for some groups, corrections increased rather than decreased misperceptions among those ideologically threatened by the fact. Later large-scale replications by Wood and Porter found backfire to be rare and corrections generally effective, making this design a case study in how political psychology refines a striking result through replication.
पूरी विधि पढ़ें
यह खंड पढ़ने के लिए निःशुल्क खाते से साइन इन करें।
पद्धति मानचित्र
सम्बन्धित पद्धतियों का परिवेश — अन्वेषण हेतु किसी नोड का चयन करें।
स्रोत
- Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 ↗
- Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019). The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes' Steadfast Factual Adherence. Political Behavior, 41(1), 135-163. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y ↗
इस पृष्ठ का उद्धरण कैसे दें
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Political Misinformation Correction Experiment (Misperception and Backfire Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/hi/political-psychology/misinformation-correction-experiment
कौन-सी पद्धति?
इस पद्धति को उसकी निकटतम सजातीय पद्धतियों के साथ रखकर उन्हें साथ-साथ पढ़ें — पुस्तकालय पुस्तकें मेज़ पर रख देता है; चुनाव आपका है।
- Elite Cue Experimentराजनीतिक मनोविज्ञान↔ तुलना करें
- Motivated Reasoning Experimentराजनीतिक मनोविज्ञान↔ तुलना करें
- Partisan Motivated Reasoning Paradigmराजनीतिक मनोविज्ञान↔ तुलना करें