विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| क्रॉस-सेक्शनल एआरडीएल× | मोमेंट विधि द्वारा क्वांटाइल रिग्रेशन (Method of Moments Quantile Regression)× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | अर्थमिति | अर्थमिति |
| परिवार | Regression model | Regression model |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 2006 | 2004 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Pesaran and colleagues | Roger Koenker and colleagues |
| प्रकार≠ | Dynamic panel model | Distribution regression |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (2016). Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric Reviews, 34(6-10), 1089-1117. link ↗ | Koenker, R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91(1), 74-89. DOI ↗ |
| उपनाम | Panel ARDL with cross-sectional dependence | GMM quantile regression |
| संबंधित | 3 | 3 |
| सारांश≠ | CS-ARDL (Cross-Sectional ARDL) applies the ARDL framework to panel data while explicitly accounting for cross-sectional dependence—correlation of shocks and relationships across units (countries, firms, regions). Introduced by Pesaran and colleagues (2016), it extends panel ARDL methods to handle common factors or global shocks affecting all units simultaneously. This is crucial for realistic modeling of internationally integrated economies and firm networks. | Method of Moments Quantile Regression combines moment-based estimation (GMM) with quantile regression to estimate distribution parameters while handling endogeneity, panel structure, and dynamic relationships. Introduced by Koenker (2004) and developed by Machado and Mata (2005), it enables distributional analysis (not just mean regression) in complex settings like dynamic panels and instrumental-variable contexts. This approach is powerful for understanding heterogeneity in treatment effects and policy impacts. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|