Controversy Mapping
Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
קראו את השיטה במלואה
התחברו עם חשבון חינמי כדי לקרוא חלק זה.
מפת שיטות
סביבת השיטות הקרובות — בחרו צומת כדי לחקור.
מקורות
- Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509102694 ↗
- Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558 ↗
איך לצטט עמוד זה
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/he/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping
איזו שיטה?
הציבו שיטה זו לצד קרובותיה הקרובות וקראו אותן זו לצד זו — הספרייה מניחה את הספרים על השולחן; הבחירה בידיכם.
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ השוואה
- Boundary-Work AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ השוואה
- Social Construction of TechnologyScience Technology Studies↔ השוואה
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ השוואה