Boundary-Work Analysis
Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.
קראו את השיטה במלואה
התחברו עם חשבון חינמי כדי לקרוא חלק זה.
מפת שיטות
סביבת השיטות הקרובות — בחרו צומת כדי לחקור.
מקורות
- Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325 ↗
- Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625
איך לצטט עמוד זה
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/he/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis
איזו שיטה?
הציבו שיטה זו לצד קרובותיה הקרובות וקראו אותן זו לצד זו — הספרייה מניחה את הספרים על השולחן; הבחירה בידיכם.
- Controversy MappingScience Technology Studies↔ השוואה
- Laboratory EthnographyScience Technology Studies↔ השוואה
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ השוואה
- Technological Frames AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ השוואה