השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| סולם סביבת העבודה× | סולם עייפות תשישות התאוששות תעסוקתית× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | בריאות תעסוקתית | בריאות תעסוקתית |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1994 | 2006 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Rudolf Moos | Winwood, Bakker, & Liss-Malone |
| סוג | Self-report | Self-report |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Moos, R. H. (1994). Work Environment Scale manual (2nd ed.). Consulting Psychologists Press. ISBN: 978-0-891-06045-2 | Winwood, P. C., Bakker, A. B., & Winwood, L. M. (2006). Do the effort–reward imbalance model and the demand control model measure occupational fatigue? A claims analysis of occupational health data. J Occup Environ Med, 48(11), 1112–1120. link ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | WES | OFER, Occupational Fatigue Scale |
| קשורות | 3 | 3 |
| תקציר≠ | The Work Environment Scale (WES) comprehensively measures 10 dimensions of the workplace social and organizational environment: involvement, peer cohesion, supervisor support, autonomy, task orientation, work pressure, clarity, control, innovation, and physical comfort. Developed by Moos and colleagues, the WES captures how the organizational climate—the shared perceptions of and attitudes about the work setting—influences worker wellbeing, satisfaction, and performance. The scale is widely used for organizational assessment, team diagnosis, and evaluation of workplace interventions. | The Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery Scale (OFER) measures worker fatigue across three dimensions: acute fatigue (tiredness after the current work period), chronic fatigue (accumulated exhaustion over weeks or months), and inter-shift recovery (ability to recuperate between work shifts). Developed by Winwood and colleagues, the OFER distinguishes between short-term fatigue (recoverable) and long-term exhaustion (requiring intervention), making it essential for identifying workers at risk of injury, burnout, and occupational health decline in high-demand roles. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|