ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

Value at Risk (VaR)×Conditional Value-at-Risk (Expected Shortfall)×
תחוםמימוןמימון
משפחהRegression modelRegression model
שנת המקור20072000
הוגה השיטהJorion (textbook benchmark); popularised by RiskMetrics / J.P. MorganRockafellar & Uryasev (2000); Acerbi & Tasche (2002)
סוגFinancial risk measureCoherent tail-risk measure
מקור מכונןJorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0071464956Rockafellar, R. T. & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. Journal of Risk, 2(3), 21-41. DOI ↗
כינוייםVaR, value-at-risk, delta-normal VaR, historical simulation VaRCVaR, expected shortfall, average value-at-risk, tail VaR
קשורות55
תקצירValue at Risk is a financial risk measure that estimates the maximum loss a position or portfolio could suffer over a fixed holding period at a given confidence level. It is the standard benchmark in risk management and regulatory capital calculations, developed in the textbook tradition of Jorion (2007) and the Basel market-risk framework.Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), also called Expected Shortfall, is a coherent tail-risk measure that quantifies the conditional expectation of losses beyond the Value-at-Risk threshold. It was introduced for optimization by Rockafellar and Uryasev (2000) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002), and it has replaced VaR as the regulatory standard under Basel III/IV.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Value at Risk · Conditional Value-at-Risk. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare