השוואת שיטות

	רגרסיית פואסון ובינומית שלילית	מודל האפקטים הקבועים לנתוני פאנל	רגרסיית קוונטילים
תחום	אקונומטריקה	אקונומטריקה	אקונומטריקה
משפחה	Regression model	Regression model	Regression model
שנת המקור	1998	2014	1978
הוגה השיטה	Cameron & Trivedi (textbook treatment); Hilbe (negative binomial)	Hsiao (textbook treatment); within transformation of panel data	Koenker & Bassett
סוג	Generalized linear model for count data	Panel data regression	Conditional quantile regression
מקור מכונן	Cameron, A. C. & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press.	Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.	Koenker, R. & Bassett, G., Jr. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50.
כינויים	count regression, log-linear count model, negative binomial regression, Poisson / Negatif Binom Regresyon	fixed effects model, within estimator, panel fixed-effects regression, Panel Veri — Sabit Etkiler Modeli	conditional quantile regression, regression quantiles, Kantil Regresyon
קשורות	4	5	5
תקציר	Poisson regression is a generalized linear model for count outcomes — events tallied as non-negative integers such as hospital admissions, accidents, or article counts. It models the log of the expected count as a linear function of the predictors, and is developed in the standard count-data treatment of Cameron and Trivedi (1998); when the counts are over-dispersed, the closely related negative binomial model (Hilbe, 2011) is preferred.	The Panel Data Fixed Effects model estimates relationships from panel data (the same units observed over several time periods) while controlling for unit- and/or time-specific effects, supporting causal inference. It is developed as the within estimator in standard treatments such as Hsiao's Analysis of Panel Data (2014).	Quantile regression models conditional quantiles of an outcome - the median, the 25th or 75th percentile, and so on - rather than the conditional mean that OLS targets. Introduced by Koenker and Bassett in 1978, it reveals how predictors act across the whole distribution, including its tails.