Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Flux de trafic (Modèle LWR)× | Routage de Muskingum× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Génie civil | Génie civil |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1955 | 1938 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | M. J. Lighthill and G. B. Whitham | George McCarthy |
| Type≠ | Macroscopic traffic flow modeling using conservation laws | Hydrologic method for flood attenuation in rivers |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Lighthill, M. J., & Whitham, G. B. (1955). On kinematic waves I. Flow movement in long rivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 229(1178), 281-316. DOI ↗ | McCarthy, G. T. (1938). The Unit Hydrograph and Flood Routing. US Army Corps of Engineers Document 608. link ↗ |
| Alias | LWR model, Traffic wave, Kinematic wave theory | Flood routing, Stream flow attenuation, Hydrologic routing |
| Apparentées | 3 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | The Lighthill-Whitham-Richards (LWR) model is a macroscopic traffic flow model that treats traffic as a compressible fluid, applying conservation of vehicles and a flow-density relationship. Introduced independently by Lighthill and Whitham (1955) and Richards (1956), the model predicts traffic wave propagation, congestion formation, and bottleneck behavior on highways. | The Muskingum method is a hydrologic flood routing technique that predicts how a flood wave attenuates (reduces in peak) and spreads as it travels down a river reach. Developed by McCarthy in 1938 for the US Army Corps of Engineers, the method is simple enough for hand calculations while capturing the essential physics of flood propagation. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|