ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Pondération par score de propension spatiale×Appariement par Score de Propension Spatiale×
DomaineInférence causaleInférence causale
FamilleRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine2000s–2010s2000s
Auteur d'origineExtended from Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003) IPTW with spatial adaptations by Keele, Titiunik and others in geographically structured causal designsExtension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onward
TypeQuasi-experimental / causal inferenceQuasi-experimental matching estimator
Source fondatriceKeele, L., & Titiunik, R. (2015). Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities. Political Analysis, 23(1), 127-155. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Aliasspatial PSW, geographically weighted propensity score weighting, spatial IPTW, spatially adjusted inverse probability weightingSpatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matching
Apparentées66
RésuméSpatial propensity score weighting extends inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to settings where units are geographically located and treatment assignment may depend on spatial factors such as location, neighborhood characteristics, or spatial clustering. By incorporating spatial covariates into the propensity score model and adjusting standard errors for spatial autocorrelation, it produces more credible causal estimates from observational geographic data.Spatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Spatial Propensity Score Weighting · Spatial Propensity Score Matching. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare