ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Pondération par score de propension spatiale×Pondération par score de propension (PSP / IPW)×
DomaineInférence causaleInférence causale
FamilleRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine2000s–2010s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Auteur d'origineExtended from Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003) IPTW with spatial adaptations by Keele, Titiunik and others in geographically structured causal designsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypeQuasi-experimental / causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
Source fondatriceKeele, L., & Titiunik, R. (2015). Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities. Political Analysis, 23(1), 127-155. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Aliasspatial PSW, geographically weighted propensity score weighting, spatial IPTW, spatially adjusted inverse probability weightingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Apparentées66
RésuméSpatial propensity score weighting extends inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to settings where units are geographically located and treatment assignment may depend on spatial factors such as location, neighborhood characteristics, or spatial clustering. By incorporating spatial covariates into the propensity score model and adjusting standard errors for spatial autocorrelation, it produces more credible causal estimates from observational geographic data.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Spatial Propensity Score Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare