Comparer des méthodes

	Conception d'une étude d'événement spatiale	Étude d'événement sur données de panel
Domaine	Inférence causale	Inférence causale
Famille	Regression model	Regression model
Année d'origine	2000s–2010s	1990s–2020s (modern panel formulation)
Auteur d'origine	Developed across applied spatial economics literature; canonical applications in Autor, Dorn & Hanson (2013) and related regional economics studies	Formalized by Freyaldenhoven, Hansen, Perez-Orive & Shapiro (2021); widely applied in finance (Fama et al. 1969) and policy evaluation
Type	Quasi-experimental causal inference with spatial structure	Quasi-experimental / causal panel design
Source fondatrice	Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121-2168.	Freyaldenhoven, S., Hansen, C., Perez-Orive, J., & Shapiro, J. M. (2021). Visualization, Identification, and Estimation in the Linear Panel Event-Study Design. NBER Working Paper 29170. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Alias	spatial event study, geographic event study, spatial dynamic DiD, place-based event study	event-study regression, dynamic DiD, relative-time regression, distributed-lag panel model
Apparentées	5	4
Résumé	Spatial event study design estimates the dynamic causal effects of a geographically concentrated shock or policy by plotting how outcomes in affected locations evolve relative to unaffected locations across time periods, while explicitly accounting for spatial spillovers and autocorrelation across geographic units. It is widely used in regional and urban economics to evaluate place-based policies, trade shocks, and local labour market interventions.	A panel event study estimates the dynamic causal effect of a treatment or policy by regressing an outcome on a full set of relative-time indicators — one for each period before and after the event — while controlling for unit and time fixed effects. The resulting coefficient plot shows how the treated units diverged from untreated units at each point in calendar time relative to their treatment date, making both pre-treatment trend violations and post-treatment effect trajectories immediately visible.