ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Modèles de fiabilité logicielle×Analyse de la couverture de code×
DomaineGénie logicielGénie logiciel
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine19791988
Auteur d'origineAlok Goel and Kazuhira OkumotoTest Coverage Community
Typestochastic modelmeasurement and analysis
Source fondatriceGoel, A. L., & Okumoto, K. (1979). Time-dependent error-detection rate model for software reliability and other performance measures. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 28(3), 206–211. DOI ↗Zhu, H., Hall, P. A. V., & May, J. H. R. (1997). Software unit test coverage and adequacy. ACM Computing Surveys, 29(4), 366–427. DOI ↗
Aliasreliability growth model, failure rate prediction, SRGMcoverage metrics, test coverage, instrumentation-based measurement
Apparentées44
RésuméSoftware reliability models predict the behavior of failure rates during testing and operation, estimating when software achieves required reliability targets. Introduced by Goel and Okumoto (1979), these stochastic models capture how defect discovery declines as testing progresses. Organizations use reliability models to forecast release readiness, estimate testing duration, and validate quality achievement.Code coverage analysis measures the extent to which source code is executed by a test suite, quantifying which lines, branches, or paths are exercised. Tools instrument code to track execution, reporting coverage percentages and identifying untested regions. Coverage analysis guides test creation, detects dead code, and validates test adequacy in quality assurance processes.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Software Reliability Model · Code Coverage Analysis. Consulté le 2026-06-15 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare