Comparer des méthodes

	Validité discriminante robuste	Validité convergente
Domaine	Psychométrie	Psychométrie
Famille	Latent structure	Latent structure
Année d'origine	1959 (foundational); 2015 (HTMT criterion)	1959
Auteur d'origine	Henseler, Ringle & Sarstedt (HTMT); Campbell & Fiske (foundational framework)	Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
Type	Validity assessment / measurement quality criterion	Validity evidence / construct validation
Source fondatrice	Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.	Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.
Alias	HTMT criterion, heterotrait-monotrait ratio, discriminant validity testing, RDV	convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
Apparentées	4	4
Résumé	Robust discriminant validity assessment determines whether distinct latent constructs in a measurement model are sufficiently different from one another. Unlike traditional AVE-based approaches, robust methods such as the Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio use the pattern of inter-indicator correlations to provide a more sensitive and simulation-validated criterion for judging discriminant validity in structural equation modeling contexts.	Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.