Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Différences-en-différences robustes× | Différence-en-différences (Diff-in-Diff)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Inférence causale | Économétrie |
| Famille | Regression model | Regression model |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2021-2023 | 1994 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Callaway & Sant'Anna; Sun & Abraham; Roth et al. (synthesised 2021-2023) | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) |
| Type | Causal inference / panel regression | Causal inference / panel regression |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 |
| Alias≠ | robust DiD, heterogeneity-robust DiD, staggered DiD, disaggregated ATT DiD | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Robust Difference-in-Differences is a family of modern DiD estimators designed to remain valid when treatment timing is staggered across units and treatment effects are heterogeneous over time or across groups. Classical two-way fixed-effects (TWFE) DiD can be severely biased in such settings; robust variants estimate group-time average treatment effects (ATTs) separately and then aggregate them in a theoretically sound way. | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|