Comparer des méthodes

	Évaluation robuste de la validité de contenu	Validité de construit
Domaine	Psychométrie	Psychométrie
Famille	Latent structure	Latent structure
Année d'origine	1975 (base); 2000s–2010s (robust extensions)	1955
Auteur d'origine	Grounded in Lawshe (1975) CVR framework; robust extensions draw on Huber, Wilcox, and robust statistics tradition	Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
Type	Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure with outlier-resistant aggregation	Validity evaluation framework
Source fondatrice	Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Alias	robust CVR, outlier-resistant content validity, robust content validity index, robust expert-panel validation	construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Robust content validity assessment applies outlier-resistant statistical methods to the aggregation of expert panel ratings in content validation studies. By detecting and down-weighting idiosyncratic or extreme rater judgements, it yields Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) estimates that reflect the consensus of the panel more accurately than standard averaging when one or a few raters deviate sharply from the group.	Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.