ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Étude de phase IV ajustée au risque×Appariement par score de propension×
DomaineÉpidémiologieStatistiques de recherche
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1990s–2000s (formalized with ICH E2E and EMA PASS guidelines)1983
Auteur d'origineRegulatory and pharmacoepidemiology community (ICH, EMA, FDA frameworks)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypeObservational / quasi-experimental clinical study designMethod
Source fondatriceStrom, B. L. (Ed.). (2005). Pharmacoepidemiology (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0470863107Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Aliasrisk-adjusted post-marketing surveillance study, adjusted Phase IV trial, risk-stratified post-authorization study, PASS with risk adjustmentPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Apparentées33
RésuméA risk-adjusted Phase IV study is an observational or semi-experimental post-marketing study conducted after a drug or device has received regulatory approval. It uses statistical risk-adjustment techniques — such as propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, or multivariable regression — to control for confounding by indication and baseline patient differences, thereby producing more credible safety, effectiveness, and utilization estimates than unadjusted real-world analyses.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Risk-adjusted Phase IV study · Propensity Score Matching. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare