ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse de survie pragmatique×Essai clinique randomisé pragmatique×
DomaineÉpidémiologieÉpidémiologie
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origineConceptual framework: 1967; widespread application: 1990s–2000s1967
Auteur d'origineSchwartz & Lellouch (explanatory vs. pragmatic distinction, 1967); extended in survival analysis literature from the 1970s onwardDaniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch
TypeObservational / experimental hybrid — time-to-event analysis in real-world or pragmatic-trial settingsInterventional study design
Source fondatriceFord, I., & Norrie, J. (2016). Pragmatic Trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(5), 454–463. DOI ↗Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗
Aliasreal-world survival analysis, pragmatic time-to-event analysis, effectiveness survival analysis, PSApragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trial
Apparentées56
RésuméPragmatic survival analysis applies time-to-event statistical methods within pragmatic or real-world settings, estimating how long patients survive, remain event-free, or retain treatment benefit under conditions of routine clinical practice. Unlike explanatory survival analyses conducted under tightly controlled trial conditions, the pragmatic variant embraces the heterogeneity, treatment switching, non-adherence, and competing events that characterise real-world patient populations, prioritising external validity over internal precision.A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Pragmatic survival analysis · Pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare