Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Analyse de puissance pour les études de survie× | Analyse de puissance pour le test t× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Statistique | Statistique |
| Famille | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1981 | 1969 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | — | Jacob Cohen |
| Type≠ | Sample size determination for survival outcomes | Sample size determination |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Schoenfeld, D. A. (1981). The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions. Biometrika, 68(1), 316–319. DOI ↗ | Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805802832 |
| Alias≠ | log-rank power analysis, cox regression power analysis, survival power analysis, Sağkalım Analizi Güç Analizi | t-test power analysis, sample size calculation for t-test, Güç Analizi — t-Testi |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Power analysis for survival studies determines how many participants — and how many observed events — are required so that a log-rank test or Cox regression has a sufficient probability of detecting a clinically meaningful difference in survival between groups. The foundational formulas were derived by Schoenfeld (1981) and Lachin (1981) and remain the standard approach in clinical trial planning. | Power analysis for the t-test is a sample size planning procedure that determines how many participants are required to detect a mean difference of a given magnitude with acceptable probability. Formalised by Jacob Cohen in his 1969 and 1988 editions of Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, it links four quantities — effect size (Cohen's d), significance level (α), statistical power (1 − β), and sample size — so that fixing any three allows calculation of the fourth. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|